Help! Universities won’t commit! Why fixed-term contracts are harmful to mental health by Anonymous 

Recent research reveals that around two thirds of University Research Staff in the UK are employed on fixed-term contracts, which are usually less than two years. This practice has no end in sight. One of my colleagues jumped between fixed-term contracts for 17 years. I am just starting my fifth year on a series of fixed-term contracts.

What does this do to academics’ mental health? In a 2019 study in the UK, “two-thirds of respondents (71%) said they believed their mental health had been damaged by working on insecure contracts and more than two-fifths (43%) said it had impacted on their physical health.” This is not a surprise. As many readers will know, insecure work in academia means incessant rounds of redundancy, endless job applications in a notoriously difficult job market, regularly changing employers, or even moving across the country. Or you could choose the route of writing laborious and hugely competitive grant applications mostly in your own time. The stakes are high: your economic survival. As such, accepting a fixed-term contract can be a risky strategy.

I am a mental health researcher, a mum, a person who lives with mental illness, and a lover of the outdoors. I am passionate about achieving research impact, and an advocate of lived-experience research. I want to make this clear: I wholeheartedly love my career, my academic research work, my job, and my excellent and supportive team. I love the intellectual challenge, I love the creativity and problem solving. I love doing impactful research that makes a difference, building networks, collaborating, writing and reading. I thrive in my job, and I am good at it. However, my fixed-term contract is harming my mental health.

Read More »

Navigating Anxiety in an Experimental Lab: Personal Growth and Peer Support by Janaky Sunil

When people think of someone pursuing a PhD, they often focus on the prestige and intellectual fulfilment associated with earning the degree. For the students themselves, however, the journey is frequently remembered as a continuous obstacle course, with many never reaching the end. Statistics underscore this reality, with studies suggesting that 33% to 70% of PhD students ultimately leave before completing their program. A recent paper in Frontiers of Psychology enlists the various factors that contribute to these outcomes, leading to notable differences across institutions and countries. The academic culture in the nation of study and more specifically the institution plays a significant role in determining the work environment. Additionally, the quality of mentorship, the complexity of the research project, and the stability of funding are all pivotal. Combined, these factors result in the fact that even for those who do complete their PhD, the process often takes much longer than anticipated.

Read More »